Complex regional pain syndrome

Please download to get full document.

View again

of 10
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Document Description
Complex regional pain syndrome
Document Share
Document Transcript
  26 Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Gabor B. Racz 1  and Carl E. Noe 2 1 Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Center, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, 2 Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Eugene McDermott Center for Pain Mangement, Univerisity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, USA 1. Introduction Complex regional pain syndromes (CRPS) are pain syndromes characterized by pain out of proportion to an inciting injury, swelling, discoloration, stiffness, hyperhidrosis (sudomotor), temperature (vasomotor) and trophic changes. Also commonly seen are fine tremor and less often spasms involving upper and lower extremities. Dr. Silas Wier Mitchell described CRPS II, or causalgia, during the American Civil War. CRPS I was described about the end of the 19 th  century by Sudek (Sudek’s atrophy). Evans described reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD). Numerous other terms used to describe similar syndromes include algodystrophy and shoulder- hand syndrome. Bonica described 3 stages of RSD. Roberts described sympathetically maintained pain. 2. Diagnostic criteria Specific inclusion criteria are needed for research studies but from a clinical perspective, many patients seem to have a constellation of signs and symptoms of CRPS without meeting strict criteria. The diagnosis is made by the process of exclusion. While avoiding over diagnosing and over treatment, the patients need to be treated. 3. Prognosis The prognosis for CRPS is highly variable and to a large extent is influenced by the treatment. Functional restoration and involving the patient in ongoing range of motion and resistive exercises is helpful. Timely pain relief and interventional pain procedures, as well as psychological support, are important. Patients need to be followed closely and treatments adjusted accordingly. Timely and appropriate referral to experienced pain physicians that are able to offer multimodal therapies may prevent costly delays and complications.   Pain Management – Current Issues and Opinions 546 4. Theories of mechanisms Multiple possible mechanisms exist for CRPS including psychological, inflammatory, vascular, neurogenic and combinations of several mechanisms. Debate regarding definitions of neuropathic pain has led to the notion that CRPS may not be neuropathic pain. Psychogenic pain could be construed as being “pain arising as a direct consequence of a lesion or disease affecting the somatosensory system” but few would think of it as neuropathic pain which should be treated with anticonvulsants. CRPS II is generally agreed to be caused by an injury to a peripheral nerve. CRPS 1 is caused by a lesion in or injury to a small nerve or multiple small nerves. It is difficult to accept that it is not neuropathic pain since it resembles CRPS II so closely. Denial of care based on psychological explanations is neither reasonable nor justifiable yet in rare instances pain can be of psychological srcin. Commonly the onset of CRPS is 1- 3 months after the injury. 5. History The diagnosis is made by process of exclusion following history of pain that is out of proportion to an injury or period of immobilization. Swelling, temperature asymmetry, stiffness, atrophy, hair, skin nail, bone changes. Tremor or spasms and asymmetry in sweat function are all potential signs. It is important to remember that many injuries are associated with pain, discoloration and swelling without being CRPS. Infection and other causes of inflammation are sometimes mistakenly thought to be CRPS. A number of patients have CRPS symptoms following stroke and classifying this as central pain or CRPS is problematic. 6. Physical exam Observation of upper extremity guarding or antalgic gait for lower extremity is important. Range of motion of affected joints is particularly important as many patients develop permanent stiffness without analgesia for specific range of motion therapy. Discoloration or asymmetrical coloration, swelling, atrophy and allodynia are other physical findings. The allodynia may be tactile or cold induced. 7. Diagnostic tests Bone scans, sweat tests and sympathetic blocks have been used but the diagnosis is a clinical one and can be made without confirmatory tests. Thermography has been used, but more commonly, the documentation of temperature differences is adequate. Early on in the evolution of the condition there may increased temperature and later reduction with the increased sympathetic activity. Three phase bone scan often show corresponding changes. Comparing contra lateral x-ray images can show osteopenia in the involved area. EMG usually does not change from the CRPS but may show nerve injury. 8. Differential diagnosis While it important to be vigilant in diagnosing CRPS, as is important to avoid misdiagnosis and over- diagnosis. Many patients have “pain out of proportion”, swelling and   Complex Regional Pain Syndrome 547 discoloration after injuries and will improve within a month with usual therapeutic interventions. Infection is always a concern after surgery or other penetrating trauma. Other causes of acute inflammation, swelling and discoloration need to be considered such as malignancy, deep venous thrombosis as well as peripheral nerve entrapment, peripheral neuropathy and other neuropathic pains. 9. Stages 3 stages of RSD have been described however it is unclear that staging has much value regarding decision making. 10. Timing Much has been made about early sympathetic blocks and failure to diagnose early. There is no data to support “emergent” sympathetic blocks and some patients have a favorable natural history. 11. Spreading Pain from CRPS can spread, in rare instances, proximally and contra- laterally. (Shah, Racz) Lower extremity pain can spread to upper extremities and vice versa. 12. Bone loss Osteopenia and fractures can occur in severe cases and aquatic therapy is useful to rehabilitate these patients. 13. Natural history The natural history of CRPS 1 is variable but in an interesting report, approximately 25% of patients that had Colles’ fractures developed signs of CRPS. (Atkins) Approximately 40% of these patients improved in 6 months. This suggests that mild cases may not require extensive treatment. Not treating the patients early can be problematic if the condition worsens. Appropriate examination and follow up is important where the disease can take a benign course. Patients obtain information on the Internet that is usually about catastrophic cases that needs to be dealt with by educating patients in an appropriate and caring manner where therapy is timely yet one can avoid catastrophizing based on inaccurate information. 14. Dogma Much of “standard care” is not evidence based, but good outcome based. Additionally, it is based on physician experience and the outcome is superior in the hands of better-trained physicians. As new information becomes available, dogma can be weeded out and treatments based on randomized controlled trails can be incorporated into treatment guidelines.   Pain Management – Current Issues and Opinions 548 15. Cases One lady had not worn high-heeled shoes for a long time and then wore a pair for several hours at an event. She developed classic signs and symptoms of RSD. She experienced profound analgesia with sympathetic blockade and the condition resolved completely. Another case was a woman who had a paper cut on her distal index finger on the job. She had classic signs and symptoms of CRPS, which resolved with a series of blocks. Both of these cases were challenged by insurance companies since the inciting injury was so minor but both patients were legitimate. The point is that physicians caring for these patients must be willing to serve as advocates for the patient even in an environment of cost containment. We have to be mindful of our “report cards” but not at the expense of a patient’s outcome. 16. Overmedication pain syndrome (OPS) Approximately 20 years ago, a movement began to improve the quality of pain care for cancer patients worldwide. The WHO analgesic ladder was promoted for cancer pain and then it was applied for other types of pain. Many patients are now taking large doses of opioid for chronic pain. Overmedication pain syndrome is characterized by a chronic treatment program consisting of high doses of multiple analgesic medications without associated functional productivity and psychological coping ability. Opioids are the most important class of drugs in pain management; however, it is clear that they are two edged swords and overmedication with opioids and other drugs classes have become a problem. Abuse may not be the largest problem. Lack of efficacy, unintended overdose, diversion, development of drug dependence, habituation and resistance to recovery and other unintended consequences may be more common. Opioid induced hyperalgesia is a real clinical phenomenon and may be a subtle barrier to analgesia in many patients. Pain that is only incrementally responsive to opioid is also common. Pseudo-addiction is defined in behavioral terms which are similar to addiction but related to pain and not addiction. The problem is that there are not good means to differentiate behaviors between the setting of pain and the setting of addiction. Some have reported a lack of data to support doses of opioid over 200 mg/day of morphine equivalents. Also, there are no long term randomized controlled trials of opioid versus placebo. Additionally, fracture rates have been reported to be increased in patients on doses above 100 mg/day. (Sullivan) Overdose rates have been reported to increase above 50 mg/day. (Dunn) Drug interactions with other medications, reported and unreported to the treating physician, have been causes of fatalities. Urine drug testing, opioid contracts and extensive documentation guidelines fail to help answer the clinical question: is the dose just too high? Patients who are taking opioids chronically should be considered for an evaluation for a lack of meaningful efficacy, fall and fracture risk and overdose risk. An interdisciplinary evaluation may be a way to accomplish these objectives. Patients who are clearly doing well   Complex Regional Pain Syndrome 549 may be less likely to accept dose reductions. Patients who are working or similarly productive and are without signs of poor coping and physical disability may need to continue taking the effective dosages. On the other hand, patients, who have been on stable doses for a long time may need age related dose reductions. Washington State has new guidelines limiting the dose of opioid to 120 mg/day of morphine equivalents. Patients, who require doses above this level, are guided to seek a pain management consultation. The purpose and intervention of a medical pain management consultation is unclear. The practitioner doing the evaluation needs to have additional training and qualification as well as be informed and knowledgeable in treatment options in addition to opioid management.  JCAHO, Press Gainey and other organizations have changed the environment with respect to patient rights regarding pain. In the past, if a patient wasn’t happy with their opioid dose, their recourse was limited. Now, patient satisfaction is used as a factor to determine healthcare provider’s compensation. The implication is that patients can pressure providers to prescribe more opioid, which is dangerous for patients and providers. Regulators have become more active due to the increased rate of diversion and its consequences. However, the accidental overdose rate increase is even more concerning. Most drugs have dose limits. For example, antibiotics and drugs for hypertension are increased to upper limits but there are limits. Perhaps it is time to limit doses of opioids regardless of pain severity for patients with non palliative care pain syndromes and find another way to treat the patient. Other drugs classes that are problematic include benzodiazepines, muscle relaxers, sleeping pills and even anticonvulsants and antidepressants. Benzodiazepines are not prominent in the pain literature as analgesics. Baclofen and tizanidine are probably the first line muscle relaxers of choice. Hypnotic drugs are used too often for chronic sleep disturbances without sleep hygiene treatment or other medications which are better for long term use. Anticonvulsant use for chronic pain has exploded as opioids have. Antidepressants, even those not associated with analgesia, are prescribed for pain. The costs of these drugs are significant and usually of incremental benefit. Most patients with chronic pain go without an interdisciplinary evaluation and many who receive an evaluation do not complete treatment with cognitive behavioral therapy, education and conditioning physical therapy. Treatment goals are frequently not established and some patients just go through the motions and are considered as a treatment failure. There is very little evidence for the multidisciplinary and physical therapy based treatments specifically for CRPS. Reimbursement has suffered for these kinds of therapies. The cognitive effects and psychological effects of chronic opioid treatment are not well known. Testosterone levels in males are known to decrease with chronic opioid administration. It is proposed that patients with chronic pain have a short term trial of low dose opioid to access functional improvement before a treatment plan is finalized. Blinding patients to their drug and dose may be very helpful but has its critics on ethical and regulatory grounds. Patients who are on doses above 50 mg/ day of morphine equivalents need to have access to interdisciplinary pain and addictionology evaluations and treatment if needed. Treatment goals should include dose reduction to below 200mg/day of morphine equivalents for those
Similar documents
View more...
Search Related
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks